top of page
Search

What Note-Taking Is Actually For

Writer: Prem Sundaram
Prem Sundaram
Sep 28
4 min read
A handwritten index card on a wooden desk, with a fountain pen nearby. Soft natural window light, warm tones.



__INTRO__

I have thirty notebooks on a shelf behind me. I have four note apps on my phone. I have a voice memo from last Tuesday that I have not opened. None of this is unusual. Most people I know collect notes the way they collect bookmarks — they save the thought, and then the thought just sits there, filed and forgotten.

Note-taking stopped making sense to me when I started asking an AI to summarize what I had read. The AI could do it faster than I could re-read my own highlights. So why bother writing things down at all? I spent two weeks trying to answer that honestly. The answer turned out to be the opposite of what I expected.


The standard answer is wrong

The usual case for note-taking is memory. Write it down so you do not forget. That is not why the people I respect most take notes. Isaac Newton said he stood "in the closet of smart men" and published their ideas as his own. Teju Cole keeps a week of reading notes because a week of small thoughts is more interesting than anything he could invent in a single sitting. Tom Wujec draws pictures instead of writing words because images stick.

None of them are optimizing for recall. They are optimizing for something else.


Note-taking is not remembering. It is colliding.

A note is not a copy of what you read. A note is what your brain did with what you read. The collision happens in the moment of writing — when you stop transcribing and start deciding what matters, what connects, what is yours.

That collision is the thing. Not the artifact on the card, but the act of writing it. The note is the residue of thinking, not a substitute for it.


Why an AI cannot do this part

An AI can summarize a book. An AI can pull out the three best ideas and rephrase them. An AI can even tell you which of your old notes relate to a new article. None of that is what your notebook is for.

Your notebook is for the parts the AI does not have. The context only you were sitting in when you read it. The connection to a conversation you had last month that nobody else remembers. The inside joke, the bad mood, the weather that day. The surprise that an LLM trained on the entire internet still cannot feel — because surprise is private. It happens in your head, in your kitchen, at your desk, with your people.

When you write a note, you are not storing information. You are storing the version of you that met that information. That version is gone in a week. The note is the only copy.


What a note is, precisely

A note is a small, durable container for one thought and the context that made it real. Not a quote. Not a summary. Not a highlight. A thought you had, with enough around it that you can meet that thought again later and remember who you were when you had it.

This is why the format matters less than people think. Cornell, mind-mapping, bullet journals, index cards — they all work, until you start trying to capture too much per note. The constraint is the point. One card, one thought, one decision about what you are keeping.


The mistake I kept making

I kept trying to make my notes searchable. Tag them. Cross-reference them. Build a system. The system is what killed it. Every note I wrote for the system felt like a chore. Every note I wrote for myself felt like a small act of honesty.

The author Gretchen Rubin said she used to feel self-conscious about pulling out her notebook in casual conversation. Then she noticed people liked it — being noted made them feel seen. That is the part I missed. The notebook is not a tool for me. It is a way of being present with people and ideas long enough that something is worth keeping.


How to start, if you have given up

Stop trying to build a system. Buy one pack of index cards. Pick one book you are already reading. Every time you finish a chapter, write one card: what did I think, what surprised me, what do I want to remember about who I was reading this.

Do not organize them yet. Do not transcribe them to an app. Let them pile up on your desk. In a month, shuffle them. Read them out of order. The interesting thing is what they say to each other when you did not plan for it. That is the part no AI has — the unedited record of your attention, and where it kept landing.


What to do this week

Pick one of these:

• One card per chapter of whatever you are reading now. Three sentences max.

• One card per conversation you have this week that you do not want to forget.

• One card per shower thought. Yes, really. The medium is the constraint; the constraint is the point.

Keep the cards on your desk. Do not move them to an app. Do not tag them. The point is the collision between them, not the search.

 
 

NOTEDEX (TM) COPYRIGHT 2026 SUNDARAM APPLIED TECHNOLOGIES INC.

bottom of page